vBCms Comments
Welcome To Hunting Country
General Hunting Forums
Archery & Bowhunting
Shooting Sports
Manufacturers' Corner
Firearms
Classifieds
Not Hunting / General Chit Chat
1.) bluecat - 05/17/2016
Do you want me to pick up your papers, mail and kinda watch over the place till you get back?
2.) Swamp Fox - 05/18/2016
How good are you at feeding cats? :-)
As for wherefore am I, we probably need a psychiatrist or at least a genealogist to get to the bottom of that one, LOL.
Here's a blast from the past from English class...Don't tell me you were absent that day...:wink
[url]http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/262200.html[/url]
Just thought I'd point it out. :wink
I do not bite my thumb at you, sir.
(Look it up...LOL)
As for wherefore am I, we probably need a psychiatrist or at least a genealogist to get to the bottom of that one, LOL.
Here's a blast from the past from English class...Don't tell me you were absent that day...:wink
[url]http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/262200.html[/url]
Just thought I'd point it out. :wink
I do not bite my thumb at you, sir.
(Look it up...LOL)
3.) bluecat - 05/18/2016
I've been known to open a few cans of friskies. :-)
4.) bluecat - 05/18/2016
...and I can launch just about anything from a porch.
5.) Swamp Fox - 05/18/2016
That has me slightly concerned for a couple of the friendlier ones... LOL
6.) bluecat - 05/18/2016
I was referring to launching food balls, LOL! Well, I've never launched a cat yet.
7.) bluecat - 05/18/2016
Getting close to moving to a new location. It's a log home with 8 acres. It's heavily wooded surrounding. Kinda came up sudden so am in the throws of figuring it all out. I'll post up some pics at some point. I've watched deer and turkey come through the yard as we were looking it over. Can't wait to move. Finally, I can step out my door and shoot my bow.
8.) Swamp Fox - 05/18/2016
Very cool. Elbow room makes a difference!
:tu:
:tu:
9.) DParker - 05/18/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41396]I was referring to launching food balls, LOL! Well, I've never launched a cat yet.[/QUOTE]
Roll the ugliness.
[video=youtube;1bGVT4-1DBU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bGVT4-1DBU[/video]
Roll the ugliness.
[video=youtube;1bGVT4-1DBU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bGVT4-1DBU[/video]
10.) Swamp Fox - 05/19/2016
"Father, you seem like a religious man..."
LOL
LOL
11.) bluecat - 05/23/2016
Where did everyone go? Hope to still get in a few turkey trips before the end of the season.
12.) DParker - 05/23/2016
Sorry, my phone crapped out the other day and I'm still trying to recover from the trauma...though it giving me an excuse to get this shiny new one is helping to heal the emotional scarring.
13.) bluecat - 05/24/2016
Glad you are still with us. I've got several sentries on the look out for the three other members...
What phone did you end up with?
What phone did you end up with?
14.) DParker - 05/24/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41403]Glad you are still with us. I've got several sentries on the look out for the three other members...
What phone did you end up with?[/QUOTE]
An unlocked (straight from the manufacturer, without all of the stupid "bloatware" that AT&T adds to phones you get from them) Galaxy S7 Edge. I'm still doing a lot of setup (I lost all of the automation scripts I'd created for my old phone, so I'm having to recreate them from scratch) and learning new features, but so far.....very nice. Wireless recharging is the bee's knees.
What phone did you end up with?[/QUOTE]
An unlocked (straight from the manufacturer, without all of the stupid "bloatware" that AT&T adds to phones you get from them) Galaxy S7 Edge. I'm still doing a lot of setup (I lost all of the automation scripts I'd created for my old phone, so I'm having to recreate them from scratch) and learning new features, but so far.....very nice. Wireless recharging is the bee's knees.
15.) bluecat - 05/24/2016
I have the Galaxy S5 which is such a huge step up from the S2 that I used to have. I'd imagine the S7 is off the charts. I think the most impressive thing with these phones to me is the quality of pictures.
16.) DParker - 05/24/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41405]I have the Galaxy S5 which is such a huge step up from the S2 that I used to have. I'd imagine the S7 is off the charts.[/QUOTE]
Probably, though I'm still trying to figure out what all it can do, and how to make use of the features. Mostly I got it for the slightly larger screen and beefier battery. The only downside so far (aside from the pain it caused to my wallet) is that it's still new enough that support from the better 3rd party accessory manufacturers is still a bit lacking. I got a good case, but as of yet there's no decent quality tempered glass screen protector available yet (several cheap Chinese ones, but they're worthless). I had one from Spigen on my S4 and it saved my screen from being shattered multiple times. I'm going to be walking on eggshells with this thing until I can get a goid TGSP for it.
[QUOTE=bluecat;41405]I think the most impressive thing with these phones to me is the quality of pictures.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, they've been pretty good about upgrading the cameras' abilities with each new model...which would mean a lot more to me if I weren't such a lousy photographer.
Probably, though I'm still trying to figure out what all it can do, and how to make use of the features. Mostly I got it for the slightly larger screen and beefier battery. The only downside so far (aside from the pain it caused to my wallet) is that it's still new enough that support from the better 3rd party accessory manufacturers is still a bit lacking. I got a good case, but as of yet there's no decent quality tempered glass screen protector available yet (several cheap Chinese ones, but they're worthless). I had one from Spigen on my S4 and it saved my screen from being shattered multiple times. I'm going to be walking on eggshells with this thing until I can get a goid TGSP for it.
[QUOTE=bluecat;41405]I think the most impressive thing with these phones to me is the quality of pictures.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, they've been pretty good about upgrading the cameras' abilities with each new model...which would mean a lot more to me if I weren't such a lousy photographer.
17.) bluecat - 05/24/2016
The last two smart phones I've gotten (S2, S5) have all been under 2.00. We wait until our contract is about to run out and then Walmart (typically in the summer) will run a special where you get a phone for about 1.50 if you renew the contract through them. It's not the latest and greatest but it's priced right.
18.) DParker - 05/24/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41408]The last two smart phones I've gotten (S2, S5) have all been under 2.00. We wait until our contract is about to run out and then Walmart (typically in the summer) will run a special where you get a phone for about 1.50 if you renew the contract through them. It's not the latest and greatest but it's priced right.[/QUOTE]
Sure...that'd be the [I]smart[/I] way to do it...at least in most cases. But IIRC, at least in this area, renewing through WalMart would cause us to lose our $25/line "out of contract" discount, so in my case it'd be a wash in the long run (over the course of the next 2.4 years, at least).
Sure...that'd be the [I]smart[/I] way to do it...at least in most cases. But IIRC, at least in this area, renewing through WalMart would cause us to lose our $25/line "out of contract" discount, so in my case it'd be a wash in the long run (over the course of the next 2.4 years, at least).
19.) bluecat - 05/24/2016
[QUOTE=DParker;41406]Probably, though I'm still trying to figure out what all it can do, and how to make use of the features.
[/QUOTE]
That's why they make 14 year old daughters.
[/QUOTE]
That's why they make 14 year old daughters.
20.) DParker - 05/24/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41410]That's why they make 14 year old daughters.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but mine's one of the older models, and is already a 27 year-old mom herself....so I'm on my own.
Yeah, but mine's one of the older models, and is already a 27 year-old mom herself....so I'm on my own.
21.) bluecat - 05/24/2016
[QUOTE=DParker;41411]Yeah, but mine's one of the older models, and is already a 27 year-old mom herself....so I'm on my own.[/QUOTE]
The newer models act up quite a bit, don't go into sleep mode readily, can't multitask and are hard to wake.
The newer models act up quite a bit, don't go into sleep mode readily, can't multitask and are hard to wake.
22.) Swamp Fox - 05/25/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41410]That's why they make 14 year old daughters.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=bluecat;41412]The newer models act up quite a bit, don't go into sleep mode readily, can't multitask and are hard to wake.[/QUOTE]
Let me tell you: The 28 year-old aerobics instructors are more than twice that much trouble...
[QUOTE=bluecat;41412]The newer models act up quite a bit, don't go into sleep mode readily, can't multitask and are hard to wake.[/QUOTE]
Let me tell you: The 28 year-old aerobics instructors are more than twice that much trouble...
23.) DParker - 05/25/2016
One of the cooler set of features I'm experimenting with is the support for biometric-based security. In addition to using a PIN or password, I can optionally train the phone to recognize my fingerprints (up to 4 different prints), my face and/or my voice so that I can unlock and use the phone by swiping a fingertip across a button, speaking to the phone or simply looking at it (the front-facing camera, specifically). So far I've only enabled fingerprint recognition, which works pretty well and seems like the most secure of the three biometric options. But it's pretty cool that what was James Bond tech not so long ago is now routine, readily available consumer-oriented stuff.
As a theft-recovery precaution I used an automation app to set up a script that responds to multiple failed attempts at unlocking the phone by silently taking a photo with the front-facing (toward the user) camera and then e-mailing it to both my home and office accounts. Leaving for work this morning I fumbled the phone a bit while unlocking it in preparation for its duty as a dash cam. When I got to my office I was greeted by an e-mail containing the ugly mug of some fat old bastard in the cab of a Nissan Frontier. :p
As a theft-recovery precaution I used an automation app to set up a script that responds to multiple failed attempts at unlocking the phone by silently taking a photo with the front-facing (toward the user) camera and then e-mailing it to both my home and office accounts. Leaving for work this morning I fumbled the phone a bit while unlocking it in preparation for its duty as a dash cam. When I got to my office I was greeted by an e-mail containing the ugly mug of some fat old bastard in the cab of a Nissan Frontier. :p
24.) Swamp Fox - 05/25/2016
LOL...My Kyocera keeps teasing me with the idea that some facial recognition capability is going on....I keep trying to update the image but I never get offered the option of using it...I have to keep typing in my password before the damn thing will work...Which I really didn't want to be married to some bizarre security regimen for the rest of my life, anyway, but Tough Shiite, apparently...I must have mashed some button I wish I could take back...And everything happens on a little girly touchy-feely keyboard that is way too small for my Trump-sized thumbs to begin with....
One word: PITA...
One word: PITA...
25.) DParker - 05/25/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41419]....my Trump-sized thumbs...[/QUOTE]
They must be yuuuuuuuge!
They must be yuuuuuuuge!
26.) Swamp Fox - 05/25/2016
I've never had any complaints...
27.) bluecat - 05/25/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41417]Let me tell you: The 28 year-old aerobics instructors are more than twice that much trouble...[/QUOTE]
There is one glaring error in your logic.
28 year-old aerobics instructor
There is one glaring error in your logic.
28 year-old aerobics instructor
28.) DParker - 05/25/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41422]There is one glaring error in your logic.
28 year-old aerobics instructor[/QUOTE]
???
28 year-old aerobics instructor[/QUOTE]
???
29.) Jon - 05/25/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41417]Let me tell you: The 28 year-old aerobics instructors are more than twice that much trouble...[/QUOTE]
Someone must have told you this, I know you don't do aerobics......:hb:
Someone must have told you this, I know you don't do aerobics......:hb:
30.) bluecat - 05/25/2016
[QUOTE=Jon;41426]Someone must have told you this, I know you don't do aerobics......:hb:[/QUOTE]
I think Swampy does pushups during the commercials of Andy Griffith.
I think Swampy does pushups during the commercials of Andy Griffith.
31.) Swamp Fox - 05/25/2016
.....
32.) DParker - 05/25/2016
I had grape nuts once. Saw the doctor about it and he gave me some ointment that cleared it right up.
33.) Swamp Fox - 05/25/2016
LOL!
GIF perfection...LOL
GIF perfection...LOL
34.) Swamp Fox - 05/26/2016
[I]Couric, an executive producer of the film, also acts as an interviewer. At a gathering of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a staunch pro-gun group, she is heard asking this question:
"If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorist [sic] from walking into, say, a licensed gun dealer and purchasing a gun?"
The documentary shows the group members quietly looking at Couric, each other and toward the ground, as if no one has an answer to the question. This goes on for about eight seconds, and then there's a transition to an explanation of background checks.
The documentary had its TV premiere on May 15. One week later, the Ammoland blog published the audio from the group interview, demonstrating that the activists started responding to Couric's question right away.
In the documentary, Ammoland said, "The clear implication is that none of the group had an answer for that question and was being evasive and avoiding eye contact. The truth is... that the group responded to Katie immediately, with answers to her question! Yet the video shows no one responding."
[/I]
Swampy sez: If there are no background checks for automobile and fertilizer purchases, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from walking into, say, a licensed car dealer and purchasing a ramming device?
[url]http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/25/media/katie-couric-guns-stephanie-soechtig/index.html?section=money_latest[/url]
"If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorist [sic] from walking into, say, a licensed gun dealer and purchasing a gun?"
The documentary shows the group members quietly looking at Couric, each other and toward the ground, as if no one has an answer to the question. This goes on for about eight seconds, and then there's a transition to an explanation of background checks.
The documentary had its TV premiere on May 15. One week later, the Ammoland blog published the audio from the group interview, demonstrating that the activists started responding to Couric's question right away.
In the documentary, Ammoland said, "The clear implication is that none of the group had an answer for that question and was being evasive and avoiding eye contact. The truth is... that the group responded to Katie immediately, with answers to her question! Yet the video shows no one responding."
[/I]
Swampy sez: If there are no background checks for automobile and fertilizer purchases, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from walking into, say, a licensed car dealer and purchasing a ramming device?
[url]http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/25/media/katie-couric-guns-stephanie-soechtig/index.html?section=money_latest[/url]
35.) DParker - 05/26/2016
Yeah, that's been blowing up in their faces all day, ever since the original unedited audio from the interview was posted online. Of course, Couric and others involved in the deception are refusing to even acknowledge the offense, let alone atome for it.
36.) Swamp Fox - 05/26/2016
Artistic license...or sump'n...
Really, I don't know how Katie Couric even gets dressed in the morning...
Really, I don't know how Katie Couric even gets dressed in the morning...
37.) DParker - 05/26/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41438]Artistic license...or sump'n...
Really, I don't know how Katie Couric even gets dressed in the morning...[/QUOTE]
And, does she do it [i]before[/i] or [i]after[/i] retrieving the $20 left on the nightstand?
Really, I don't know how Katie Couric even gets dressed in the morning...[/QUOTE]
And, does she do it [i]before[/i] or [i]after[/i] retrieving the $20 left on the nightstand?
38.) Swamp Fox - 05/26/2016
Ouch!---
LOL
LOL
39.) bluecat - 05/26/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41438]Artistic license...or sump'n...
Really, I don't know how Katie Couric even gets dressed in the morning...[/QUOTE]
Hey buster, she puts her pant suit on "one leg at a time" just like you do.
Really, I don't know how Katie Couric even gets dressed in the morning...[/QUOTE]
Hey buster, she puts her pant suit on "one leg at a time" just like you do.
40.) bluecat - 05/26/2016
[QUOTE=DParker;41439]And, does she do it [i]before[/i] or [i]after[/i] retrieving the $20 left on the nightstand?[/QUOTE]
And if she left the proper change.
And if she left the proper change.
41.) DParker - 05/26/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41443]And if she left the proper change.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;HyVnoe9EF30]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyVnoe9EF30[/video]
[video=youtube;HyVnoe9EF30]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyVnoe9EF30[/video]
42.) bluecat - 05/26/2016
"Katie, can you break a five?"
43.) Swamp Fox - 05/30/2016
....
44.) bluecat - 05/31/2016
That's beautiful Swampy.
45.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
This is fun, too.
This was a Hillary tweet not long ago, with the following message:
[I]Dear Congress,
Let's get this done.
Thanks,
The vast majority of Americans
[/I]
This is the reply that won Twitter that day...LOL:
More:
[url]https://reason.com/blog/2016/05/20/hillary-clinton-just-tweeted-a-godawful[/url]
This was a Hillary tweet not long ago, with the following message:
[I]Dear Congress,
Let's get this done.
Thanks,
The vast majority of Americans
[/I]
This is the reply that won Twitter that day...LOL:
More:
[url]https://reason.com/blog/2016/05/20/hillary-clinton-just-tweeted-a-godawful[/url]
46.) bluecat - 05/31/2016
47.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
:laugh:
:applause: :applause: :applause:
:applause: :applause: :applause:
48.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
More shocking dishonesty:
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/05/28/breaking-jim-sullivan-responds/[/url]
Haven't seen the interview. I don't subscribe to HBO, much less HBO Sports.
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/05/28/breaking-jim-sullivan-responds/[/url]
Haven't seen the interview. I don't subscribe to HBO, much less HBO Sports.
49.) DParker - 05/31/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41514]More shocking dishonesty:
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/05/28/breaking-jim-sullivan-responds/[/url]
Haven't seen the interview. I don't subscribe to HBO, much less HBO Sports.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;SjbPi00k_ME]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME[/video]
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/05/28/breaking-jim-sullivan-responds/[/url]
Haven't seen the interview. I don't subscribe to HBO, much less HBO Sports.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;SjbPi00k_ME]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME[/video]
50.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
Round up the usual suspects!
51.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
Disturbing how that used to be just a humorous line, and now it's the sad truth.
:tap:
:tap:
52.) bluecat - 05/31/2016
Hildebeast said Bill is going to be in charge of the economy. Good times.
53.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
I'd say better the economy than the White House staff
:omg:
but then there's the whole inconvenient truth about the Clinton economy and about the soon-to-be mortgage crisis...I'd say Hilllary better watch her step if she wants to get in the ring about economic management....assuming she can stay out of jail and fend off her comrade, Bernie.
:omg:
but then there's the whole inconvenient truth about the Clinton economy and about the soon-to-be mortgage crisis...I'd say Hilllary better watch her step if she wants to get in the ring about economic management....assuming she can stay out of jail and fend off her comrade, Bernie.
54.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
But he's such a lovable scamp, maybe people will let him back in the White House as long as he promises not to pee on everything...
Short memories could be a problem.
Short memories could be a problem.
55.) Swamp Fox - 05/31/2016
....
56.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
I'm glad I procrastinated on posting about Katie Couric's producer being in hot water (or she should be) because now there's another layer to the story. Basically, it came out a few days ago that the dumb bunny was implicating herself and her producer in federal firearms violations as she told the background story to a "reporter" on video. Gushing astonishment that all this gun buying was legal, it turns out that no, dumbass, it's not, as anyone who's not a gun control nut could have told her long ago. I'm sure you can find that video all over if you haven't seen it already, so I won't post it right now.
So now she's changed her story (Had an "Oh, shit!" moment, probably) changed the details and claims the new version was all legal. Umm, "No, dumbass" again.
Here are all the juicy details. Hope this brightens everyone's day. :wink:wave:
Excerpt:
[I]To sum up Soechtig’s case, then: The United States doesn’t have enough laws regulating firearms, which is why Soechtig’s team was able to buy a Bushmaster and three handguns in another state without a background check or any paperwork, but actually they didn’t do that because it turns out that that’s illegal, so on second thought they got a state resident to buy one handgun and an out-of-state resident to buy three non-Bushmaster rifles, and, even though that’s flagrantly illegal too, it’s actually not because the can-you-believe-we-did-this? exemption changes everything, and anyway federal law doesn’t apply if you don’t leave the state and if you manage to somehow convince the police to quickly melt property that is protected by law, and, oh screw it, something must be done! and if it saves one life! and why oh why oh why oh why is the National Rifle Association so damn mean? Or, put another way, Soechtig is making precisely the sort of ignorant, malleable, and downright dishonest charges that we have come to expect from a gun-control movement that never, ever bothers to learn anything about a topic on which it has such strong opinions. It would be supremely amusing if, in an attempt to mislead the public into believing that what is illegal is legal, Soechtig or a member of her team ended up imprisoned for having ignored the very laws that they routinely pretend do not exist.
[/I]
Read more at: [url]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436400/katie-couric-gun-documentary-likely-violated-federal-law[/url]
So now she's changed her story (Had an "Oh, shit!" moment, probably) changed the details and claims the new version was all legal. Umm, "No, dumbass" again.
Here are all the juicy details. Hope this brightens everyone's day. :wink:wave:
Excerpt:
[I]To sum up Soechtig’s case, then: The United States doesn’t have enough laws regulating firearms, which is why Soechtig’s team was able to buy a Bushmaster and three handguns in another state without a background check or any paperwork, but actually they didn’t do that because it turns out that that’s illegal, so on second thought they got a state resident to buy one handgun and an out-of-state resident to buy three non-Bushmaster rifles, and, even though that’s flagrantly illegal too, it’s actually not because the can-you-believe-we-did-this? exemption changes everything, and anyway federal law doesn’t apply if you don’t leave the state and if you manage to somehow convince the police to quickly melt property that is protected by law, and, oh screw it, something must be done! and if it saves one life! and why oh why oh why oh why is the National Rifle Association so damn mean? Or, put another way, Soechtig is making precisely the sort of ignorant, malleable, and downright dishonest charges that we have come to expect from a gun-control movement that never, ever bothers to learn anything about a topic on which it has such strong opinions. It would be supremely amusing if, in an attempt to mislead the public into believing that what is illegal is legal, Soechtig or a member of her team ended up imprisoned for having ignored the very laws that they routinely pretend do not exist.
[/I]
Read more at: [url]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436400/katie-couric-gun-documentary-likely-violated-federal-law[/url]
57.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
I'm glad now that I procrastinated on posting about Katie Couric's propaganda collaborator being in hot water (or she should be) because now there's another layer to the story. Basically, it came out a few days ago that the dumb bunny was implicating herself and her producer in federal firearms violations as she told the background story of the "documentary" to a "reporter" on video.
Gushing astonishment that all this gun buying was legal, it turns out that no, dumbass, it's not, as anyone who's not a gun control nut could have told her before she stepped in it. I'm sure you can find that video all over if you haven't seen it already, so I won't post it right now.
So now she's changed her story (Had an "Oh, shit!" moment, probably) changed the details and claims the new version was all legal. Umm, "No, dumbass" again.
Here are all the juicy details. Hope this brightens everyone's day. :wink:wave:
Excerpt:
[I]To sum up Soechtig’s case, then: The United States doesn’t have enough laws regulating firearms, which is why Soechtig’s team was able to buy a Bushmaster and three handguns in another state without a background check or any paperwork, but actually they didn’t do that because it turns out that that’s illegal, so on second thought they got a state resident to buy one handgun and an out-of-state resident to buy three non-Bushmaster rifles, and, even though that’s flagrantly illegal too, it’s actually not because the can-you-believe-we-did-this? exemption changes everything, and anyway federal law doesn’t apply if you don’t leave the state and if you manage to somehow convince the police to quickly melt property that is protected by law, and, oh screw it, something must be done! and if it saves one life! and why oh why oh why oh why is the National Rifle Association so damn mean?
Or, put another way, Soechtig is making precisely the sort of ignorant, malleable, and downright dishonest charges that we have come to expect from a gun-control movement that never, ever bothers to learn anything about a topic on which it has such strong opinions. It would be supremely amusing if, in an attempt to mislead the public into believing that what is illegal is legal, Soechtig or a member of her team ended up imprisoned for having ignored the very laws that they routinely pretend do not exist.
[/I]
Read more at: [url]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436400/katie-couric-gun-documentary-likely-violated-federal-law[/url]
Gushing astonishment that all this gun buying was legal, it turns out that no, dumbass, it's not, as anyone who's not a gun control nut could have told her before she stepped in it. I'm sure you can find that video all over if you haven't seen it already, so I won't post it right now.
So now she's changed her story (Had an "Oh, shit!" moment, probably) changed the details and claims the new version was all legal. Umm, "No, dumbass" again.
Here are all the juicy details. Hope this brightens everyone's day. :wink:wave:
Excerpt:
[I]To sum up Soechtig’s case, then: The United States doesn’t have enough laws regulating firearms, which is why Soechtig’s team was able to buy a Bushmaster and three handguns in another state without a background check or any paperwork, but actually they didn’t do that because it turns out that that’s illegal, so on second thought they got a state resident to buy one handgun and an out-of-state resident to buy three non-Bushmaster rifles, and, even though that’s flagrantly illegal too, it’s actually not because the can-you-believe-we-did-this? exemption changes everything, and anyway federal law doesn’t apply if you don’t leave the state and if you manage to somehow convince the police to quickly melt property that is protected by law, and, oh screw it, something must be done! and if it saves one life! and why oh why oh why oh why is the National Rifle Association so damn mean?
Or, put another way, Soechtig is making precisely the sort of ignorant, malleable, and downright dishonest charges that we have come to expect from a gun-control movement that never, ever bothers to learn anything about a topic on which it has such strong opinions. It would be supremely amusing if, in an attempt to mislead the public into believing that what is illegal is legal, Soechtig or a member of her team ended up imprisoned for having ignored the very laws that they routinely pretend do not exist.
[/I]
Read more at: [url]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436400/katie-couric-gun-documentary-likely-violated-federal-law[/url]
58.) DParker - 06/09/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41671][I]It would be supremely amusing if, in an attempt to mislead the public into believing that what is illegal is legal, Soechtig or a member of her team ended up imprisoned for having ignored the very laws that they routinely pretend do not exist.[/I][/QUOTE]
That'll happen right after David Gregory is arrested for this:
That'll happen right after David Gregory is arrested for this:
59.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
Behold the stupidity:
60.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
[QUOTE=DParker;41672]That'll happen right after David Gregory is arrested for this:
[/QUOTE]
I don't know. The Justice Department seems pretty legit to me...LOL
[/QUOTE]I don't know. The Justice Department seems pretty legit to me...LOL
61.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
62.) bluecat - 06/09/2016
Is it just me or does Katie Couric's head look squished?
63.) bluecat - 06/09/2016
64.) DParker - 06/09/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41673]Behold the stupidity:[/QUOTE]
They didn't even have the sense to say, "Hold my beer and watch this" first.
They didn't even have the sense to say, "Hold my beer and watch this" first.
65.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
[QUOTE=bluecat;41676]Is it just me or does Katie Couric's head look squished?[/QUOTE]
Also looks small...I'd say 1 1/2 x 1 1/2 inches, but that's just a guess...
Also looks small...I'd say 1 1/2 x 1 1/2 inches, but that's just a guess...
66.) DParker - 06/09/2016
[QUOTE=Swamp Fox;41679]Also looks small...I'd say 1 1/2 x 1 1/2 inches, but that's just a guess...[/QUOTE]
And yet there's still plenty of empty space inside.
And yet there's still plenty of empty space inside.
67.) Swamp Fox - 06/09/2016
LOL...Good one.
She has a lot of balls saying initially that she stands by the film-maker and is proud of the film, and then that she was uncomfortable with the edit and should have objected more strenuously, considering that the film will not be corrected and she's out there right now "hoping it stirs a conversation" according to something I read today.
If she and the film-maker wanted to have a baby together, all they'd need would be Michael Moore's uterus. Might not even need a doctor.
She has a lot of balls saying initially that she stands by the film-maker and is proud of the film, and then that she was uncomfortable with the edit and should have objected more strenuously, considering that the film will not be corrected and she's out there right now "hoping it stirs a conversation" according to something I read today.
If she and the film-maker wanted to have a baby together, all they'd need would be Michael Moore's uterus. Might not even need a doctor.
68.) bluecat - 06/09/2016
:laugh:
69.) DParker - 09/13/2016
[URL="http://wtvr.com/2016/09/13/vcdl-sues-katie-couric/"]Katie Couric (and producers) sued for $12 million over misleading gun doc edit[/URL]
70.) bluecat - 09/13/2016
"Yes, and it counts"
71.) Swamp Fox - 09/14/2016
Ask your moms for a book at Christmas:
[url]https://ricochet.com/364294/the-war-on-guns-john-lotts-important-new-book/[/url]
[url]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439901/[/url]
I'd love to point out to the court that Couric was proud of the film, but was uncomfortable with the edit and felt she should have objected more strenuously.
It would almost make law school worthwhile.
[url]https://ricochet.com/364294/the-war-on-guns-john-lotts-important-new-book/[/url]
[url]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439901/[/url]
I'd love to point out to the court that Couric was proud of the film, but was uncomfortable with the edit and felt she should have objected more strenuously.
It would almost make law school worthwhile.